The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and must not be construed as legal advice. Visitors to this site should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in this site without seeking legal or other professional advice from an attorney licensed in the visitor’s state and the state where the visitor’s matter is pending or may be pending now or in the future. The content of this website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments or updates. The Sklar Law Firm LLC and Adam B. Sklar, Esq. expressly disclaim all liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all of the contents of this site. The Sklar Law Firm LLC and Adam B. Sklar, Esq. are not liable for any confidential or sensitive information that is sent through this website and visitors to this site are advised that their communications through this website may not be confidential. The transmission of the contents of this website, in part or in whole, and/or communication with The Sklar Law Firm LLC and Adam B. Sklar, Esq. via Internet, email, or through this website does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with The Sklar Law Firm LLC and Adam B. Sklar, Esq. The Sklar Law Firm LLC and Adam B. Sklar, Esq. do not endorse, and are not responsible for, any third-party content that may be assessed through this website.
The Nebraska Supreme Court released an opinion on Friday, April 7, 2017, denying the State’s request to reverse the Nebraska Judge’s holding that the State’s ban on gay adoption was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court also awarded legal fees in excess of $150,000 to attorneys representing the adoptive families, and clearly stated that a gay adoption ban was akin to ‘White’s Only” racial discrimination signs.
According to this blog, Osaka, Japan just became the first city in Japan to recognize same-sex adoption.
Help A Family Adopt
Know someone Pregnant and Considering Adoption?
Call or Text 1-800-790-5260
According to this book, President Nixon considered Richard Harding Poff for a nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court. Poff wanted the seat but withdrew his name from consideration because he didn’t want the press writing about his son’s adoption believing his son was too young to understand. Poff gave up the seat and the press learned about and wrote about it anyway.
Here’s an article with audio recording where the Governor of South Dakota tries to explain why he feels the bill he signed allowing adoption agencies to discriminate is not anti-gay adoption in an attempt to convince states not to enact travel bans on South Dakota. The article also mentions that the State of California may soon follow San Francisco by banning all official State of California business travel to South Dakota.
According to this article, four states: Alabama, Georgia, South Dakota, and Tennessee have all sought to enact anti-gay adoption legislation by allowing state licensed adoption agencies to refuse service to gay couples. Citizens are urged to contact their representatives to voice their concern over this new trend.
Click here to contact your representative.
According to this article, a Federal Judge just ruled that the State of Florida improperly required widows and widowers in same-sex marriages to petition the Court for recognition on the death certificate if their spouse died prior to the date of the US Supreme Court decision declaring state bans on same-sex marriage unconstitutional.
While this does not directly relate to same-sex adoption, it is significant in showing some challenges that the State of Florida continues to seek to place on same-sex couples.
According to this article, a Roman Catholic mother in New South Wales Australia – who involuntarily lost her parental rights to her child based on drug use and the manslaughter of her other child – unsuccessfully argued to the New South Wales Supreme Court that her child could not be adopted by a lesbian couple because (a) the lesbian couple refused to raise the child Catholic given the Church’s position on gay relationships; and (b) it was against the Roman Catholic mother’s religious beliefs.
The Court did not disregard the arguments of the Roman Catholic mother, but instead decided the case on a multitude of factors that all focused on the best interest of the child.
This article reviews the top ten adoption tax credit facts to consider.
According to this article, parents of children adopted overseas are nervously and closely reexamining their adoption paperwork to confirm whether or not the current administration and U.S. government view their child as a citizen of the United States.
THE SKLAR LAW FIRM LLC CONTACT INFORMATION
40 MULBERRY DRIVE
MANALAPAN, NEW JERSEY 07726 USA
(732) 289-6253 FAX